Return to: Medical School : Academic Health Center : myAHC : U of M Home

Gold University of Minnesota M. Skip to main content. Link to University of Minnesota homepage
IPTR masthead graphic
Whats Inside
Contact Us

About Us

Registry Staff

Annual Reports

IPTR Database

IPTR Links

Slide Library

 

IPTR Home

Home > Annual Reports > 1998 Annual Report > Pancreas Graft Outcome by Immunosuppression Therapy

Printer-friendly version   Mail this page to a friend

Pancreas Graft Outcome by Immunosuppression Therapy


  • Pancreas graft function with or without anti-T-cell agents was analyzed by recipient category.

  • For initial maintenance immunosuppression, regimens (induction therapy), outcome was analyzed for the 4 most common combinations, all of which included cyclosporine (CsA), Azathioprin (Aza), tacrolimus (Tac) [FK506], Mycophenalate Mofetil (MMF).

  • The majority of the pancreas transplant recipients received one or both of the new immunosuppression drugs of this era: Tac and MMF.

Pancreas Graft Function by Anti-T Cell Induction (USA)

About three-fourths of US cadaveric SPK 1994-1998 recipients received monoclonal (ATG) or polyclonal (OKT3) anti-T-cell agents for induction therapy. The pancreas graft survival rate was not significantly different with or without anti-T-cell agents at one year: 81-84% (Figure 16).

SPK Graft Function by Anti-T-Cell Therapy
Figure 16

For 1994-1998 US cadaveric PAK cases, pancreas graft survival was significantly higher with anti-T-cell agents compared to without them: at one year, ATG = 77%; OKT3 = 67%; None = 61% (Figure 17).

PAK Graft Function by Anti-T-Cell Therapy
Figure 17

For 1994-1998 US cadaveric PTA cases, there was not a significant difference in pancreas graft survival (p=>0.18) with the use of anti-T-cell agents (Figure 18).

PTA Graft Function by Anti-T-Cell Therapy
Figure 18

Previous Page / Next Page / Index Page


Feedback | Notice of Privacy Practices

 
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.