Return to: Medical School : Academic Health Center : myAHC : U of M Home

Gold University of Minnesota M. Skip to main content. Link to University of Minnesota homepage
IPTR masthead graphic
Whats Inside
Contact Us

About Us

Registry Staff

Annual Reports

IPTR Database

IPTR Links

Slide Library

 

IPTR Home

Home > Annual Reports > 2000 Annual Report > SPK Immunosuppression Therapy

Printer-friendly version   Mail this page to a friend

SPK Immunosuppression Therapy


Almost three-fourths of 1996-2000 SPK recipients received anti-T-cell agents as induction, regardless of maintenance immunosuppression (Figure 13). Overall pancreas graft survival rates were slightly higher for the Zenapax/Simulect group (89%), particularly for ED cases. For initial maintenance immunosuppression in SPK cases with anti-T cell therapy, pancreas GSRs were significantly higher in those recipients who received MMF versus AZA, whether in combination with CsA or Tac . Without anti-T cell therapy, there was no difference by maintenance immunosuppression (Figure 14a and 14b). Most SPK recipients received anti-T cell therapy plus Tac & MMF (n=1379); GSRs were similar for BD (n=557) and ED (n=801): 85% and 84% respectively (p>0.06).

SPK Graft Survival by Immunosuppression (with Anti-TC Therapy)
Figure 14a

SPK Graft Survival by Immunosuppression (without Anti-TC Therapy
Figure 14b

Previous Page / Next Page / Index Page


Feedback | Notice of Privacy Practices

 
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.